Homeland Security Red Alert
Posted by Moon on 16 Nov 2005 at 01:05 pm | Tagged as: Opinions
This is Moon chiming in. This is purely 100% a Homeland Security issue, so felt it should be discussed here. Writing for Jewish World Review, Michelle Malkin has some unusuallu harsh words for President Bush:
Things are going from bad to worse at the Bush Department of Homeland Security.
Do not be fooled by DHS chief Michael Chertoff’s tough-sounding rhetoric. While the Washington muckety-mucks pay lip service to reforming the nation’s broken detention and deportation system, catch-and-release of immigration lawbreakers remains the order of the day — not only at the border, but all across the country’s interior.
The rudderless and overwhelmed U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency still does not have a new chief. Which is just as well since Bush nominee Julie Myers (a nice Bush lawyer with virtually no immigration or customs enforcement experience who happens to be the niece of recently retired chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Richard Myers/wife of Chertoff’s chief of staff/former employee of Chertoff and former colleague of outgoing ICE head Michael Garcia) would provide as much leadership and morale-boosting ability as a pair of junior high pom-poms. Her nomination is still pending.
Meanwhile, as illegal immigration continues unabated, the White House has seen fit to honor the chief of the Border Patrol, David Aguilar, with a presidential "Meritorious Executive" award, which comes with a cash bonus, for his outstanding performance. I kid you not.
It’s not much better over at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, which administers all immigration benefits, from citizenship applications to asylum requests to work permits, and is responsible for overseeing all amnesty, student visa and marriage visa applicants. The head of the agency, a nice banker named Eduardo Aguirre whose only experience in immigration law was his own personal background as a Cuban refugee, left in June after two years in office to become ambassador to Spain. Aguirre’s biography says that under his "leadership," CIS "made significant and measurable progress towards eliminating the immigration benefit application backlog, improving customer service, and enhancing national security."
Mission accomplished? Don’t make me laugh.
A new report by the DHS inspector general’s office showed that Aguirre’s agency has failed miserably to crack down on the estimated 4 million to 8 million foreigners who have overstayed their visas — a supposed priority in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, which highlighted how lax enforcement against visa overstayers has enabled many al Qaeda operatives to stay in the country.
Of the 301,046 leads the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency received in 2004 on possible visa violators, the inspector general found, only 4,164 were formally pursued, resulting in just 671 apprehensions — few of which will actually result in deportation.
In these trying times for conservatives in Washington, you’d think the last thing the Bush administration might do is send up yet another crony/diversity nominee to fill a sensitive post. But Aguirre’s proposed replacement, Emilio T. Gonzalez, is just such an embarrassment. He appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee recently and was endorsed by two Florida Republicans — Sen. Mel Martinez and Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, who said Gonzalez would "bring an understanding of national security and my own personal immigration experience to bear."
Gonzalez is a Cuban refugee who arrived in the U.S. at the age of 4, achieved the American dream, and served honorably in the Army for 26 years. This makes him a remarkable success story. It does not make him a good candidate to head the Citizenship and Immigration Services agency in a time of war.
Scouring his resume, one finds no immigration law expertise whatsoever outside his personal experience.
No indication that he has any clue about how to curtail rampant asylum fraud.
No indication that he has any idea how to deal with those massive numbers of visa overstayers and immigration benefit fraudsters, let alone root out terrorist operatives among them.
And no indication that he would have the ability or willingness to ensure that the millions of "guest workers" under Bush’s proposed amnesty plan would be competently screened, registered and deported after their "guest" terms are up.
Zip. Nada. None.
This has been the Bush plan on immigration enforcement and border security:
Recruit the clueless. Reward the failures. Those who abide by the law lose. The con artists, the criminals, the ideological border saboteurs and the terrorists win.
The reason I felt compelled to put this here is Michelle Malkin is a staunch neo-conservative. Bush has been getting a LOT of heat on border control. If the Michelle Malkin’s are this fed up with the lack of something tangible being produced, my bet is the polls showing Bush’s declining popularity are probably correct.
– Moon
Opinions
Well, yes. I have been consistently adamant (as you and I have discussed on numerous occasions) that the border control policy of this country, and especially President Bush’s southern border policy, was severely lacking. I guess Michelle finally caught up to some of us who know a little bit and do more than rant and rave.
Aside from that, we’ve talked about the “pendulum” of American politics, and about how the extreme right and left were likely to be surprised when the middle re-emerged. I think that there will be a surprising result in the ‘06 elections. I just hope that some of the “good guys” (Republicans I like) aren’t caught up in it.
When you have a vote of 79-19 in the Senate calling for progress reports re: Iraq (even though another vote asking for a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq was defeated), then you don’t need a poll to start to see how the GWB base has shifted.